Opinion
Case No. CV01-0202-S-BLW
March 8, 2002
ORDER
On or about December 6, 2001 Magistrate Judge Williams issued an Order in this matter noting that Petitioner has been released from prison, and that, as a result, his Habeas Corpus Petition may be moot because it was a challenge to a parole revocation rather than a challenge Co the underlying conviction. See Docket No. 8, entered December 11, 2001. That Order cautioned "If Petitioner has other information or argument he wishes to present to the District Court regarding the propriety of dismissal, he should present it to the District Court immediately." Petitioner has submitted no further information or argument to this Court.
Based upon its do novo review of this matter, and, for the reasons stated in Judge Williams' Order, the Court determines that this matter is moot and is subject to dismissal. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 983 (1998); Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir. 1991); Fendler v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 846 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1988).
ORDER
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Habeas Corpus Petition filed in this matter is MOOT. This action is therefore DISMISSED.