From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Longley v. State Employees

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2006
277 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2006)

Opinion

Daniel J. Klau, Richard F. Wareing and Joseph J. Chambers, in support of the petition.

Donald M. Longley, pro se, and Richard K. Greenberg, pro se, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2006.


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 712 (AC 26186), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, in the calculation of retirement income, pursuant to the State Employees Retirement Act, accrued vacation time and longevity payments should be counted as additions to `base salary'?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17617.


Summaries of

Longley v. State Employees

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2006
277 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2006)
Case details for

Longley v. State Employees

Case Details

Full title:DONALD M. LONGLEY ET AL. v. STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT COMMISSION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

277 Conn. 914 (Conn. 2006)

Citing Cases

Longley v. State Employees Retirement Comm

We granted the commission's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…