From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 5, 1938
281 N.W. 75 (Minn. 1938)

Opinion

No. 31,844.

August 5, 1938.

Appeal and error — parties — failure to join real party in interest.

Failure to join as respondent a party to the action who is the real party in interest and whose interests are vitally affected by the result here is fatal to the appeal, and it will be dismissed.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Stevens county, Stephen A. Flaherty, Judge, denying their motion for a temporary injunction to restrain defendant Ryan as sheriff from executing a writ of restitution issued out of the municipal court of the city of Morris in favor of defendant D.M. Doyle, wherein defendants moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to join defendant Doyle as a party. Appeal dismissed.

T.J. Mangan, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Frank P. Ryan, S.S. Flaherty, and C.A. Gay, for defendants-respondents.



This matter comes here upon a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal for failure to join the defendant Doyle in the appeal. The suit is for an injunction to restrain the sheriff from executing a writ of restitution issued by the municipal court of the city of Morris. The litigation out of which grew the present case originated in a forcible entry and unlawful detainer action brought by Doyle against the plaintiffs in this action in the municipal court of Morris. The history of that action is not important upon this motion, but briefly it appears that when the municipal court became aware that the title to the property in controversy was in dispute it certified the case to the district court, from which it was remanded to the municipal court, where Doyle secured a judgment in his favor and a writ of restitution was issued to the sheriff. Thereupon this suit was commenced against the sheriff alone, and a temporary injunction was sought to prevent the execution of the writ of restitution upon the theory that both courts lost jurisdiction by reason of the certification to the district court, which it is asserted was without authority of law. Thereupon Doyle sought and obtained an order making him a party defendant herein. This order was made and filed on May 16, 1938, and on June 9 the plaintiffs took an appeal from an order denying their application for a temporary injunction. This motion to dismiss made by both the sheriff and Doyle followed.

From the foregoing facts it will be seen that Doyle is the real party in interest in this proceeding. He was a party to the action long prior to the taking of the appeal, and a reversal of the trial court's order would vitally affect his interests, which were adverse to those of the appellants. Therefore he should have been made a party to the appeal, and without his joinder the appeal must be dismissed. Kells v. Nelson-Tenney Lbr. Co. 74 Minn. 8, 76 N.W. 790.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Long v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 5, 1938
281 N.W. 75 (Minn. 1938)
Case details for

Long v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:LARRY LONG AND OTHERS v. HELEN A. RYAN AND ANOTHER

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 5, 1938

Citations

281 N.W. 75 (Minn. 1938)
281 N.W. 75

Citing Cases

Thayer v. Duffy

Our attention has been directed to the fact that no notice of the appeal herein was served upon plaintiff…

In re Sale of Land to Prudential Insurance Co.

In this position the appellant and the company are adverse parties within the meaning of the statute, and…