From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Peters

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 27, 2007
219 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-5281.

Filed On: February 27, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 00cv01443).

Before: TATEL, GARLAND and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. Long claims that the Department of Transportation discriminated against her on the basis of her race in denying her a career ladder promotion. The Department submitted evidence that it did not promote Long because she was not qualified for a promotion. J.A. 14-15. Long did not offer sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute that the Department's nondiscriminatory explanation was pretextual. Id. at 18. Therefore, the District Court properly granted the Department's motion for judgment as a matter of law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 50(a). Cf. Barnette v. Chertoff, 453 F.3d 513, 519 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See FED. R. APP. P. 41(b); D.C. CIR. R. 41.


Summaries of

Long v. Peters

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 27, 2007
219 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Long v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE P. LONG, APPELLANT v. MARY E. PETERS, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

219 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2007)