From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LONG IS TRUST CO v. WILLIAMS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 13, 1988
142 Misc. 2d 4 (N.Y. App. Term 1988)

Opinion

December 13, 1988

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, Alice Schlesinger, J.

Halpern, Halpern, Axelrod, Kirschenbaum Phillips, P.C. (Kenneth G. Zitter of counsel), for appellant.

Leonard Williams, respondent pro se.


Order entered October 28, 1986 affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Alice Schlesinger, J., at the Civil Court.

The issue of the commercial reasonableness of the public sale pertained not to defendant's liability under the security agreement, but rather was relevant to determine plaintiff's entitlement to damages (see, General Elec. Credit Corp. v Durante Bros. Sons, 79 A.D.2d 509; Paco Corp. v Vigliarola, 611 F. Supp. 923, 925 [ED N Y 1985]). Hence, the issue was properly considered at the assessment following the grant of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff.

OSTRAU, P.J., SANDIFER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LONG IS TRUST CO v. WILLIAMS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 13, 1988
142 Misc. 2d 4 (N.Y. App. Term 1988)
Case details for

LONG IS TRUST CO v. WILLIAMS

Case Details

Full title:LONG ISLAND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. LEONARD WILLIAMS, Respondent, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1988

Citations

142 Misc. 2d 4 (N.Y. App. Term 1988)
539 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

In re Sackman Mortgage Corp.

The term "commercially reasonable" is not specifically defined by the N.Y.U.C.C. and has been held to mean…

Coxall v. CLOVER COMMERCIAL

"The purpose of the notice requirement is `to give the debtor an opportunity to protect his interest in the…