London v. Kaplin

Full title: KEITH LONDON, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROMAN KAPLIN, et al., Defendants

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Oct 25, 2014

Case No. 14-CV-0125 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 14-CV-0125

10-25-2014

KEITH LONDON, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROMAN KAPLIN, et al., Defendants

LYNN ADELMAN District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

In an Order entered September 10, 2014, I directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before October 10, 2014. I advised plaintiff that this action would be dismissed for failure to prosecute if he did not file an amended complaint by that date. Nevertheless, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 41(c) (E.D. Wis.) (copy attached) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 25th day of October, 2014.

s/ Lynn Adelman

LYNN ADELMAN

District Judge

Civil Local Rule 41(c)

Dismissal for Lack of Diligence

Whenever it appears to the Court that the plaintiff is not diligently prosecuting the action, the Court may enter an order of dismissal with or without prejudice. Any affected party may petition for reinstatement of the action within 21 days.