From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lollis v. Courtney

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division
Sep 27, 2010
Civil No. 10-CV-4018 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-CV-4018.

September 27, 2010


ORDER


Now on this 27th day of September, 2010, comes on for consideration the proposed findings and recommendations filed herein on August 31, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days having passed without objections being filed by the parties, the Court hereby adopts in toto the findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Plaintiff's Complaint should be and is hereby dismissed as it fails to state a claim under Section 1983. This case is considered a "strike" pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the Clerk of Court is directed to place the appropriate flag on this case.

Further, the Court finds that Plaintiff remains liable for the filing fee. See e.g., In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 538, 529-30 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding even if the petition is dismissed, the full filing fee is still assessed because the PRLA makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner brings a civil action or file an appeal).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lollis v. Courtney

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division
Sep 27, 2010
Civil No. 10-CV-4018 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Lollis v. Courtney

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WAYNE LOLLIS PLAINTIFF v. DETECTIVE JIMMY COURTNEY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division

Date published: Sep 27, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-CV-4018 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)