From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Logsdon v. Crawford

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Apr 29, 2024
No. 21-CV-252-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

21-CV-252-JFH-JAR

04-29-2024

DONALD RAY LOGSDON, Plaintiff, v. DORIS CRAWFORD, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN F. HEIL, III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson. Dkt. No. 167. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel filed by Defendant Doris Crawford [Dkt. No. 119] be granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice.

Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within the fourteen-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and accepts and adopts it as the order of this Court. On that basis, Defendant's Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 119] is granted. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Logsdon v. Crawford

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Apr 29, 2024
No. 21-CV-252-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Logsdon v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RAY LOGSDON, Plaintiff, v. DORIS CRAWFORD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

No. 21-CV-252-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 29, 2024)