From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Logan v. Cox

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Dec 28, 2022
2:22-CV-2187 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-2187

12-28-2022

GLICENIA LOGAN PLAINTIFF v. JAMES COX, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) (“R&R”) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. The Court placed a filing restriction on Plaintiff Glicenia Logan in the case of Logan v. Sky Rise Real Estate Fund, LLC, et al., Civil No. 2:21-cv-02063, due to her practice of filing the same frivolous lawsuit repeatedly. The Magistrate Judge believes the instant lawsuit is the same as the ones that were previously dismissed.

Today Ms. Logan filed a document called “AFFIDAVIT OF GLICENIA CARMELA LOGAN IN RELATION TO ALL CASE FILE SINCE 9/19/2019.” The document does not refer to or engage with the R&R and is therefore not a valid objection. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the case de novo and agrees with the Magistrate Judge: The Complaint is largely incomprehensible. In fact, the only reason the Court is able to extract any meaning at all from the Complaint is due to the Court's familiarity with Ms. Logan's long, tedious, and abusive filing history. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY and the case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Logan v. Cox

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Dec 28, 2022
2:22-CV-2187 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Logan v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:GLICENIA LOGAN PLAINTIFF v. JAMES COX, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-2187 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 28, 2022)