From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loftus v. Fin. Indus. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 2, 2021
20 CIVIL 7290 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 7290 (SHS)

02-02-2021

ROBERT LOFTUS, Plaintiff, v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 1, 2021, because this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to review plaintiff's disciplinary record, and because plaintiff has no right to an expungement hearing, defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Dated: New York, New York

February 2, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Loftus v. Fin. Indus. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 2, 2021
20 CIVIL 7290 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Loftus v. Fin. Indus. Regulatory Auth.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LOFTUS, Plaintiff, v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 2, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 7290 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)

Citing Cases

Tanjutco v. NYLIFE Sec.

The remaining Respondent, FINRA Chair Carol Maria Luttati, is also a private actor who is not subject to…