From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loftus v. Eldahmy Wellness Pharm.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 7, 2022
2:21-cv-05024-DSF-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-05024-DSF-SK

01-07-2022

WILLIAM LOFTUS Plaintiffs, v. ELDAHMY WELLNESS PHARMACY INC., et al. Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge.

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Eldahmy Wellness Pharmacy Inc. failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before January 21, 2022 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loftus v. Eldahmy Wellness Pharm.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 7, 2022
2:21-cv-05024-DSF-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Loftus v. Eldahmy Wellness Pharm.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LOFTUS Plaintiffs, v. ELDAHMY WELLNESS PHARMACY INC., et al…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 7, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-05024-DSF-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2022)