From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lofton v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 22, 2024
CV 23-09107-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-09089-SPG-AS

05-22-2024

Kevin Lofton v. United States of America


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, on or before June 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant United States of America did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lofton v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 22, 2024
CV 23-09107-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Lofton v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Kevin Lofton v. United States of America

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 22, 2024

Citations

CV 23-09107-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2024)