From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lofton v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 27, 2024
CV 23-09089-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-09107-SPG-AS

02-27-2024

Kevin Lofton v. United States of America


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before March 12, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s):

United States of America

Plaintiff can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lofton v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 27, 2024
CV 23-09089-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Lofton v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Kevin Lofton v. United States of America

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 27, 2024

Citations

CV 23-09089-SPG-AS (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)