From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loftis v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00002-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00002-SKO

03-03-2023

MARQUISE D. LOFTIS, Petitioner, v. JAMES HILL, Respondent.


ORDER

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Respondent's first request for an extension of time to file a response.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Respondent's first request for an extension of time to file a response is granted;

2. Respondent's response to the petition is due on or before April 5, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loftis v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00002-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Loftis v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:MARQUISE D. LOFTIS, Petitioner, v. JAMES HILL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 3, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00002-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2023)