From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LOEB v. BIEN, JR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1900
49 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

March Term, 1900.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Rumsey, Patterson, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.


Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.


This case coming on for trial before the court and a jury, counsel for the defendants moved for a dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that the action cannot be maintained, as chapter 354 of the Laws of 1899 "swept away all remedies existing prior to the act without any saving clause." The question as to the application of chapter 354 of the Laws of 1899 (amending § 34 of the Stock Corporation Law, Laws of 1892, chap. 688), where an action had been commenced prior to its passage to recover the penalty prescribed for the failure to file a a report, was passed upon in St. George Vineyard Co. v. Fritz ( 48 App. Div. 233), and it was held that that act did not apply. That decision is controlling, and it follows that the complaint was improperly dismissed. The judgment is, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

LOEB v. BIEN, JR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1900
49 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

LOEB v. BIEN, JR

Case Details

Full title:Willy Loeb, Appellant, v. Julius Bien, Jr., and Another, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1900

Citations

49 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)