From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Locricchio v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 30, 2014
SCPW-14-0000381 (Haw. Jan. 30, 2014)

Opinion

SCPW-14-0000381

01-30-2014

ANTHONY P. LOCRICCHIO, Petitioner, v. THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, ACTING CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL CHARLENE M. NORRIS, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS


(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the January 26, 2014 petition for a writ of mandamus submitted by Petitioner attorney Anthony P. Locricchio, this court concludes nothing in the petition or the attached exhibits supports the conclusion that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel has violated a duty owed this court, or abused the discretion delegated to it by this court to investigate the allegations of misconduct lodged against the Petitioner. See Breiner v. Sunderland, 112 Haw. 60, 64-65, 143 P.3d 1262, 1266-67 (2006); In re Disciplinary Bd. of the Hawai'i Supreme Court, 91 Hawai'i 363, 368-71, 984 P.2d 688, 693-96 (1999); Akinaka v. Disciplinary Ed. of the Hawai'i Supreme Court, 91 Hawai'i 51, 57, 979 P.2d 1077, 1083 (1999). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 30, 2014.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Sabrina S. McKenna

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Richard W. Pollack


Summaries of

Locricchio v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 30, 2014
SCPW-14-0000381 (Haw. Jan. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Locricchio v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY P. LOCRICCHIO, Petitioner, v. THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Jan 30, 2014

Citations

SCPW-14-0000381 (Haw. Jan. 30, 2014)