Opinion
June 7, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The language of the defendant's deed clearly creates a five-foot-wide easement in favor of the plaintiffs. Therefore, the court properly enjoined the defendant from obstructing the land over which the plaintiffs have an easement (see generally, Laera v. Molina, 100 A.D.2d 615; 487 Elmwood v. Hassett, 83 A.D.2d 409).
Moreover, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the defendant's counterclaim as untimely (see, Oneida County Mobile Home Sales v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 47 N.Y.2d 954; Rahabi v. Morrison, 81 A.D.2d 434).
We have not considered the defendant's remaining contentions as they were not raised before the Supreme Court (see, Block v Magee, 146 A.D.2d 730). Sullivan, J.P., Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.