From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lockhart v. Hempstead General Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 2000
274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted March 29, 2000.

July 3, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for the mishandling of a corpse, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), entered June 11, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court entered May 5, 1999, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff's notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5512[a]).

Irving Singer, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant.

Furey Furey, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y. (Susan Darlington of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order is vacated, and the motion is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The defendant did not establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as it failed to offer "strong and satisfactory" proof that the deceased's first wife was still alive at the time of his marriage to the plaintiff (Matter of Estate of Brown, 40 N.Y.2d 938, 939; see, Matter of Seidel v. Crown Indus., 132 A.D.2d 729; see, Matter of Meltzer v. McAnns Bar Grill, 85 A.D.2d 826). Thus, questions of fact exist as to whether the plaintiff was the deceased's next of kin.


Summaries of

Lockhart v. Hempstead General Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 2000
274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Lockhart v. Hempstead General Hospital

Case Details

Full title:EDNA LOCKHART, APPELLANT, v. HEMPSTEAD GENERAL HOSPITAL, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 759

Citing Cases

Mack v. Brown

"[T]he presumption in favor of the validity of the second marriage is a powerful one, requiring strong and…