From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lo Cascio v. Kristensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1952
280 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

June 30, 1952.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.


Action for a judgment declaring illegal and void a certain ordinance of the City of Yonkers, adopted by the Common Council of that city in 1945 and known as General Ordinance No. 50-1945, amending the city's zoning ordinance and accompanying map by changing the zone classification of a stated area, and for injunctive relief. Judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits, after trial, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents. The power to amend, supplement or change the zoning ordinance is granted by section 83 Gen. City of the General City Law, and the questioned ordinance was adopted in compliance with that section. (Cf. Homefield Assn. of Yonkers v. Frank, 273 App. Div. 788, affd. 298 N.Y. 524; Rohlman v. City of Yonkers, 275 App. Div. 842.)


Summaries of

Lo Cascio v. Kristensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1952
280 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Lo Cascio v. Kristensen

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LO CASCIO, JR., et al., Appellants, v. KRISTEN KRISTENSEN, as Mayor…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Shefler v. City of Geneva

We accordingly conclude that if the ordinance of 1953 amends, supplements or changes the regulations and…

Miner v. City of Yonkers

The power to amend, supplement, or change the zoning ordinance is granted by section 83 Gen. City of the…