Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc.

3 Citing cases

  1. Hill v. Franklin

    2023 CA 0970 (La. Ct. App. Sep. 25, 2024)

    As a court of general jurisdiction, the district court has jurisdiction over a claim generally related to workers' compensation unless the legislature, through some specific provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, designated the claim a workers' compensation matter or otherwise granted hearing officers (workers' compensation judges) authority to adjudicate the claim. Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc., 47,025 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/9/12), 92 So.3d 560, 564, writ denied, 2012-1318 (La. 9/28/12), 98 So.3d 844.

  2. Maxie v. Bates

    338 So. 3d 564 (La. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 3 times

    Rain and Hail , L.L.C. v. Davis , 49,813 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/20/15), 165 So. 3d 1204 ; Simpson v. Davidson , 35,048 (La. App. 2 Cir. 10/31/01), 799 So. 2d 652 ; State ex rel. Div. of Admin. , Office of Risk Management v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Louisiana , 2010-0689 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2/11/11), 56 So. 3d 1236, writ denied , 2011-0849 (La. 6/3/11), 63 So. 3d 1023. As noted by this Court in Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc. , 47,025 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/9/12), 92 So. 3d 560, writ denied , 2012-1318 (La. 9/28/12), 98 So. 3d 844, the denial of a motion for summary judgment is merely an interlocutory ruling that does not bar reconsideration of the same issues raised in the unsuccessful motion. We note that the standard form policies submitted as exhibits attached to both motions appear to be identical and are both numbered Form 11000 03/06, which is the form described on the Declarations Page for the policy issued to the named insured, Annie Bates.

  3. Palowsky v. Campbell

    337 So. 3d 567 (La. Ct. App. 2022)

    Because it is a court of general jurisdiction, the 4th Judicial District Court had jurisdiction over Mr. Palowsky's underlying lawsuit in the Cork case. See , Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc. , 47,025 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/9/12), 92 So.3d 560, 564, writ denied , 12-1318 (La. 9/28/12), 98 So.3d 844. As a Supernumerary Judge pro tempore for the 4th Judicial District Court, Judge Jones was generally empowered to discuss legal issues pending before the Court and to assist in the case-deciding process.