From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Llorca v. Manzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, all of the papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see, CPLR 511 [d]).

CPLR 503 (a) provides as a general rule that the "place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when the action] was commenced". Here, however, the record reveals that none of the parties resided in Kings County at the time of the commencement of the action, and thus the plaintiff's choice of venue was improper. Accordingly, the plaintiffs forfeited their right to select the place of venue ( see, Ward v. National Car Rental, 226 A.D.2d 449; Tomasulo v. Berland, 217 A.D.2d 655; Nixon v. Federated Dept. Stores, 170 A.D.2d 659). Thereafter, the defendant promptly served its answer along with a demand for change of venue pursuant to CPLR 511 (b), and followed it up within 15 days with a motion to change venue to a proper venue pursuant to CPLR 503 (a), 510, and 511. Accordingly, the motion should have been granted ( see, Nixon v. Federated Dept. Stores, supra).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Llorca v. Manzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Llorca v. Manzo

Case Details

Full title:ALICE LLORCA et al., Respondents, v. MARY MANZO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 83

Citing Cases

N. E. Data v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

A motion to change venue on the grounds that plaintiff has selected an improper venue (CPLR 510 [1]) may be…

Brave v. The City of New York

It appears that no party resides or is situated in Kings County. Hence, Kings County is not the proper venue…