From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liyokho v. Colo. Technical Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02332-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02332-MSK-KMT

04-17-2013

MODESTAR LIYOKHO, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (PUEBLO CAMPUS), Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

"Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's 'Response to Defendants [sic] Answers to the First Ammended [sic] Complaint'" (Doc. No. 49, filed Apr. 16, 2013) is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), the only permissible pleadings in a civil action are "(1) a complaint; (2) an answer to a complaint; (3) an answer to a counterclaim designated as a counterclaim; (4) an answer to a crossclaim; (5) a third-party complaint; (6) an answer to a third-party complaint; and (7) if the court orders one, a reply to an answer." Defendants have not asserted any counterclaims in their Answer. (See Doc. No. 46, filed Mar. 8, 2013.) As such, absent a court order, a reply to Defendant's Answer is not a permissible pleading. Accordingly, "Plaintiff [sic] Response to Defendants [sic] Answers to the First Ammended [sic] Complaint by the Plaintiff" (Doc. No. 48) is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

Liyokho v. Colo. Technical Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02332-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Liyokho v. Colo. Technical Univ.

Case Details

Full title:MODESTAR LIYOKHO, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (PUEBLO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02332-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2013)