In Livingston v. Rogers, 2 Johns. Cas. 488, the plaintiff destroyed the instrument, " not thinking it of any utility to be preserved."
Summary of this case from Bagley v. EatonOctober, 1914.
Interlocutory judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
In Livingston v. Rogers, 2 Johns. Cas. 488, the plaintiff destroyed the instrument, " not thinking it of any utility to be preserved."
Summary of this case from Bagley v. EatonFull title:Elbert C. Livingston, a Resident, etc., Respondent, v. C. Milton Rogers…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1914
The case of Riggs v. Taloe, 9 Wheat. 483, is very like this, for there one paper was voluntarily…