From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liverpool v. City of New York

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
19-CV-5527 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-5527 (JGK)

06-30-2021

ANTON LIVERPOOL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge

The New York State Attorney General (NYAG) and the City of New York (NYC) responded to the Court's June 15, 2021 order directing them to conduct further investigation based on the information provided by the plaintiff. The NYAG and NYC have not been able to identify the John Doe defendant "Williams" despite a thorough investigation. Accordingly, the NYAG and NYC have discharged their obligation to attempt to locate the Joe Doe defendant. As there are no other remaining defendants in the case, unless the plaintiff provides an alternative solution, the Court will have to dismiss the case for failure to serve pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Liverpool v. City of New York

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
19-CV-5527 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Liverpool v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANTON LIVERPOOL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

19-CV-5527 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)