From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litton Indus. Products, Inc. v. Limbach

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 27, 1991
58 Ohio St. 3d 169 (Ohio 1991)

Summary

In Litton Indus. Prod., Inc. v. Limbach (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 169, 170, 569 N.E.2d 481, we stated that "a corporation pays a tax for the ensuing year if it is organized to do business in Ohio on January 1 of that year."

Summary of this case from LSDHC Corp. v. Zaino

Opinion

No. 90-424

Submitted January 9, 1991 —

Decided March 27, 1991.

Taxation — Franchise tax — Computation — Net income factor — Net operating loss carryover of corporations upon merger — Successor corporation may not deduct loss, when — R.C. 5733.04, construed.

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 87-G-187.

Litton Industrial Products, Inc. ("Industrial"), appellant, and Litton Medical Products, Inc. ("Medical"), were wholly owned sister corporations of Litton Industries, Inc. On November 2, 1974, Medical merged into Industrial; Industrial survived the merger.

Medical, a July to July fiscal year taxpayer, in its 1974 corporate franchise tax return for the fiscal year ending in July 1973, reported a net operating loss apportionable to Ohio of $462,124 (before adjustment per federal audit). It filed a 1975 return, covering the fiscal year ending July 28, 1974, and reported a net operating loss of $750,332 (before federal adjustment).

Industrial, in its 1976 corporate franchise tax return, which is at issue in this case, carried over and deducted both of Medical's losses.

On audit, the Tax Commissioner, appellee, allowed the 1973 deduction but disallowed the 1974 deduction. On appeal, the BTA affirmed the commissioner's order because Medical was not a taxpayer for the tax year 1975 and, consequently, Industrial could not succeed to Medical's 1974 net operating loss, which Medical would have reported in tax year 1975 had it still existed.

This cause is before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Calfee, Halter Griswold, Marc L. Oberdorff and Joseph A. Castrodale, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, attorney general, and James C. Sauer, for appellee.


According to R.C. 5733.04(I)(1), as it read at the time pertinent herein, a taxpayer may deduct from Ohio net income "* * * any net operating loss incurred in any taxable yea[r] * * *. This deduction * * * shall be carried over and allowed * * * until fully utilized in the next succeeding taxable year or years in which the taxpayer has net income, but in no case for more than five consecutive years after the taxable year in which the net operating loss occurs." The surviving corporation in a merger may take the net operating loss deduction because it may do so under Section 381, Title 26, U.S. Code. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Lindley (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 23, 15 O.O. 3d 42, 398 N.E.2d 790, paragraph one of the syllabus.

Industrial maintains that it may deduct the loss generated in fiscal (and taxable) year 1974 because it was a taxpayer then and incurred the loss then. However, we agree with the commissioner, who convincingly argues that the precise wording of the statute does not permit the deduction.

The franchise tax, an excise tax, taxes corporations for the privilege of doing business in Ohio in corporate form. R.C. 5733.01(A). Under R.C. 5733.01(B), a corporation becomes subject to this tax on the first day of January of the calendar year that it is so organized. Thus, a corporation pays a tax for the ensuing year if it is organized to do business in Ohio on January 1 of that year.

R.C. 5733.04(B) defines "taxpayer" as "* * * a corporation subject to the tax imposed by this chapter"; R.C. 5733.04(F) defines "tax year" as "* * * the calendar year in and for which the tax provided by * * * [the franchise tax] chapter is required to be paid"; and R.C. 5733.04(E) defines "taxable year" as "* * * the year or portion thereof upon the net income of which the value of the taxpayer's issued and outstanding shares of stock is determined or the year at the end of which the total value of the corporation is determined."

R.C. 5733.05 directs the calculation of the value of the taxpayer's issued and outstanding shares of stock, on which the tax is based, on either the net worth or net income basis. R.C. 5733.05(B) provides that:

"The sum of the corporation's net income, during the year or portion thereof preceding the date of commencement of its annual accounting period that includes the first day of January of the tax year [shall be allocated or apportioned to Ohio] * * *."

Under this language, a corporation measures the tax, if on the net income basis, on the net income received in the year preceding the annual accounting period that contains January 1 of the tax year. So, the 1975 tax year would measure net income in the preceding, namely, 1974, accounting period to calculate the 1975 tax.

Had Medical existed on January 1, 1975, this accounting period would have been for the fiscal and taxable year ending July 28, 1974. But, Medical was not in business on January 1, 1975. Thus, the fiscal year ending July 28, 1974 was not a taxable year for it under R.C. 5733.04(I)(1); consequently, these losses did not occur in a taxable year and cannot be deducted. Despite Medical's incurring of a net operating loss, the franchise tax does not recognize the loss as a deduction. Therefore, neither it nor its successor may deduct the loss.

As support for its argument, Industrial cites Ben Tom Supply Co. v. Lindley (Sept. 2, 1976), BTA No. E-21, unreported. There, the BTA, in similar circumstances, allowed the deduction. However, neither party in Ben Tom Supply Co. asserted that, and the BTA did not address whether, a surviving corporation succeeded to the net operating loss that a defunct corporation incurred in a nontaxable year. Thus, the BTA did not address the question at hand. Moreover, the commissioner here allowed Industrial to deduct the 1973 loss, which Medical incurred in a taxable year.

Finally, we note that the General Assembly has recently provided for future mergers of this type. Under R.C. 5733.053 (Am. Sub. H.B. No. 111, effective July 1, 1989), the transferee in a merger must report the transferor's net income and may apply the transferor's net operating loss against net income.

Accordingly, we affirm the BTA's decision. Medical did not incur the disputed loss in a taxable year; consequently, no recognizable loss existed for Industrial to inherit.

Decision affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Litton Indus. Products, Inc. v. Limbach

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 27, 1991
58 Ohio St. 3d 169 (Ohio 1991)

In Litton Indus. Prod., Inc. v. Limbach (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 169, 170, 569 N.E.2d 481, we stated that "a corporation pays a tax for the ensuing year if it is organized to do business in Ohio on January 1 of that year."

Summary of this case from LSDHC Corp. v. Zaino

In Litton Indus. Products v. Limbach, 58 Ohio St.3d 169, 569 N.E.2d 481 (1991), the Ohio Supreme Court dealt with a franchise tax, which was an excise tax upon corporations for the privilege of doing business in Ohio in corporate form.

Summary of this case from In re Tax Appeal of Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

In Litton, one corporation, Litton Medical Products, Inc., merged into Litton Industrial Products, Inc., on November 2, 1974. Litton Medical had a fiscal year from July to July.

Summary of this case from In re Tax Appeal of Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
Case details for

Litton Indus. Products, Inc. v. Limbach

Case Details

Full title:LITTON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT, v. LIMBACH, TAX COMMR.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 27, 1991

Citations

58 Ohio St. 3d 169 (Ohio 1991)
569 N.E.2d 481

Citing Cases

In re Tax Appeal of Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

The Department cites several cases to support its argument. In Litton Indus. Products v. Limbach, 58 Ohio…

Ohio Grocers Association v. Wilkins

In the case of a corporation it is sometimes spoken of as a franchise tax." Cincinnati, Milford Loveland…