Opinion
Argued October 20, 1890
Decided December 16, 1890
James R. Marvin for plaintiffs.
Jacob F. Miller for defendants.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except VANN and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Little v. Webster
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1890
122 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1890)
Summaries of
Little v. Webster
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1890
122 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1890)
Case details for
Little v. Webster
Case Details
Full title:JOSEPH J. LITTLE et al., Plaintiffs, v . CHARLES L. WEBSTER et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 16, 1890
Citations
122 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1890)
Citing Cases
Watson v. Owen
We submit that a direct conflict in the evidence is conclusive against the reformation of an instrument for…
Sternback v. FriedmanThere is not that preponderance of evidence — that proof, clear and decisive — which would justify the court…