From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. Special Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 1, 2019
No. 4:19-cv-239-JAR (E.D. Mo. Mar. 1, 2019)

Opinion

No. 4:19-cv-239-JAR

03-01-2019

CAROLYN A. LITTLE, Plaintiff, v. SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the motion of plaintiff Carolyn A. Little for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action. The Court has considered the motion and the financial information provided therein, and has determined to grant the motion. In addition, the Court will direct plaintiff to submit a copy of the right-to-sue letter she received from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC").

Plaintiff brings this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq., for alleged age discrimination and retaliation. In the complaint, plaintiff stated she filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC and received a right to sue letter. However, she neither provided the date of that letter, nor attached a copy of the letter to her complaint. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on February 15, 2019.

Plaintiff did, however, attach copies of charges of discrimination she filed with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights ("MCHR") dated January 3, 2016 and May 22, 2017, along with a copy of a June 26, 2017 MCHR right-to-sue letter related to the latter charge. Review of Missouri Case.net shows that plaintiff has filed at least two employment discrimination cases in state court. See Carolyn Little v. Special School District, No. 17SL-CC03076 (21st Jud. Cir. 2017) and Carolyn Little v. Special School District, No. 18SL-CC1614 (21st Jud. Cir. 2018). --------

A plaintiff in an ADEA action has ninety days from receipt of the right-to-sue letter from the EEOC to file a civil action. Littell v. Aid Ass'n for Lutherans, 62 F.3d 257, 259 (8th Cir. 1995). As plaintiff has not provided a copy of such letter, the Court is unable to determine whether plaintiff has timely filed this action. Therefore, the Court will order the plaintiff to supplement the complaint by submitting a copy of the right-to-sue letter she received from the EEOC.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall file a copy of the right-to-sue letter she received from the EEOC.

Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice.

Dated this 1st day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Little v. Special Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 1, 2019
No. 4:19-cv-239-JAR (E.D. Mo. Mar. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Little v. Special Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN A. LITTLE, Plaintiff, v. SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 1, 2019

Citations

No. 4:19-cv-239-JAR (E.D. Mo. Mar. 1, 2019)