From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. Garabrant

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1897
153 N.Y. 661 (N.Y. 1897)

Summary

In Little v. Garabrant (90 Hun 404, opinion by PARKER, J., later Ch. J. of this court, affd. on opinions below in 153 N.Y. 661), it was held that with the consent of all the stockholders and with no rights of creditors involved, the corporate assets might be given away.

Summary of this case from Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1897

Decided June 8, 1897

James M. Fisk for appellant.

Frederic A. Ward for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinions below.

All concur.


Summaries of

Little v. Garabrant

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1897
153 N.Y. 661 (N.Y. 1897)

In Little v. Garabrant (90 Hun 404, opinion by PARKER, J., later Ch. J. of this court, affd. on opinions below in 153 N.Y. 661), it was held that with the consent of all the stockholders and with no rights of creditors involved, the corporate assets might be given away.

Summary of this case from Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel
Case details for

Little v. Garabrant

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH J. LITTLE, as Receiver of THE WORTHINGTON COMPANY, Appellant, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1897

Citations

153 N.Y. 661 (N.Y. 1897)

Citing Cases

Diamond v. Diamond

Such being the facts, it necessarily follows that, were plaintiff to be permitted to recover in this…

Diamond v. Diamond

Such being the facts, it necessarily follows that, were plaintiff to be permitted to recover in this…