From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 6, 2023
4:82-cv-866-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 6, 2023)

Opinion

4:82-cv-866-DPM

01-06-2023

LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, JACKSONVILLE/NORTH PULASKI SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. DEFENDANTS EMILY MCCLENDON, TAMARA EACKLES, VALERIE STALLINGS, TIFFANY ELLIS, and LINDA MORGAN INTERVENORS


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court appreciates and approves PCSSD's latest facilities report, Doc. 5805. All the changes proposed are reasonable and prudent. The Court confirms its prior Orders about PCSSD's remaining obligations at Mills. In particular, no additional report is required until July absent some material change in the approved plan, such as on the ROTC facilities. Intervenors should ? along with other interested individuals ? express their thoughts, suggestions, and concerns fully in the quarterly public meetings. All matters of detail, though important of course, are now in PCSSD's capable hands. Monitoring PCSSD's compliance with the court-approved plan for truing-up the facilities does not extend to managing those details.

Intervenors should monitor the big picture. PCSSD continues to demonstrate its good faith, and the District should press on.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 6, 2023
4:82-cv-866-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 6, 2023

Citations

4:82-cv-866-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 6, 2023)