noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"
Summary of this case from Country Fl. v. Partnership of Gepner FordNo. 85-112.
June 2, 1986.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 759 F. 2d 1305.
noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"
Summary of this case from Country Fl. v. Partnership of Gepner FordFull title:LITTLE CROW MILLING CO., INC., ET AL. v. BALTIMORE OHIO RAILROAD ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 2, 1986
These toxic and radioactive materials may be ingested with food or water. See American Mining Congress v.…
Copy Cop, Inc. v. Task Printing, Inc.This argument fails under the cases, which hold that a party's "failure to object to limited geographic use…