From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2004
8 A.D.3d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3642.

Decided June 15, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry L. Crispino, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2003, which granted the City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the City's motion denied, the complaint reinstated and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Cascione, Purcigliotti Galluzzi, P.C., New York (Joseph DiBenedetto of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Tahirih M. Sadrieh of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.


While the City's Department of Parks witnesses were able to testify from their personal knowledge that the site of plaintiff's slip and fall was not on park grounds, their testimony was insufficient to establish that the site of the accident was not otherwise owned by the City or that it was owned by the Board of Education. Accordingly, since questions of fact remain regarding its ownership of the accident site, the grant of summary judgment to the City was unwarranted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Liso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2004
8 A.D.3d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Liso v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA LISO, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 498

Citing Cases

Samuel v. City of Saratoga Springs

Likewise such does not provide any affirmative evidence of who does own the premises. Wright v C.H. Martin…