From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lira v. Prosper

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 29, 2023
2:05-cv-02452 WBS GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)

Opinion

2:05-cv-02452 WBS GGH

03-29-2023

BENJAMIN LIRA, Plaintiff, v. K. PROSER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action which was previously dismissed pursuant to his notice to voluntarily dismiss the action and defendants' statement of non-opposition. Plaintiff has moved to reopen this action. (Docket Nos. 38, 42.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 302.

On November 19, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (Docket No. 46.) No objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 19, 2021 are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motions to reopen (Docket Nos. 38, 42) are DENIED.


Summaries of

Lira v. Prosper

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 29, 2023
2:05-cv-02452 WBS GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Lira v. Prosper

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN LIRA, Plaintiff, v. K. PROSER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 29, 2023

Citations

2:05-cv-02452 WBS GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)