From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liptak v. Ally Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 8, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-0882-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-0882-KJD-GWF

03-08-2013

V.F. LIPTAK, Plaintiff, v. ALLY BANK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's 2nd Request for Recusal (#21). Much like Plaintiff's first request the second request is meritless. Plaintiff's motion to recuse must be denied, because he has failed to establish that the Court's impartiality might be reasonably questioned. See Toth v. Trans World Airlines, 862 F.2d 1381, 1387-88 (9th Cir. 1988)(bias or prejudice justifying recusal must arise from an extrajudicial source and not from conduct or rulings made during the course of the proceeding). Plaintiff has not demonstrated any extrajudicial source of bias or prejudice, other than his conclusions that a conspiracy must be afoot due to the Court's decisions that have not been in his favor. Therefore, the Court denies his motion to recuse.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Liptak v. Ally Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 8, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-0882-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Liptak v. Ally Bank

Case Details

Full title:V.F. LIPTAK, Plaintiff, v. ALLY BANK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-0882-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)