From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 17, 2021
No. 17816-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

17816-21S

09-17-2021

Alejandro Lino & Maria E. Quishpe Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On September 15, 2021, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code. The envelope in which the petition was mailed does not bear a postmark. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before October 8, 2021, respondent shall file a First Supplement to his motion to dismiss. In that First Supplement, following a diligent inquiry with knowledgeable U.S. Postal Service personnel, respondent shall set forth and discuss fully when an envelope, properly addressed to the Tax Court would ordinarily have been received at the Court. Such ordinary mailing time shall take into account the irradiation of mail sent to the Tax Court.

1


Summaries of

Lino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 17, 2021
No. 17816-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Lino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Alejandro Lino & Maria E. Quishpe Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

No. 17816-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 17, 2021)