From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linn v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 4, 2012
4:12-cv-00004-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)

Opinion

4:12-cv-00004-DPM-JTK

12-04-2012

KEVIN LINN PLAINTIFF v. CHAD MASON DEFENDANT


ORDER

On November 19, 2012, this Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff (Doc. No. 26). However, the Order mailed to Plaintiff at his last-known address was returned to sender on November 30, 2012 (Doc. No. 29).

Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), a pro se plaintiff must promptly notify the Clerk of the Court and other parties of any change in his address, and must monitor the progress of the case and prosecute it diligently. Furthermore, the Local Rule provides for the dismissal without prejudice of any action in which communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty days. Although Plaintiff has apparently changed his address, this Order will be sent to his last-known address. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify this Court of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action, within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2012.

_______________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Linn v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 4, 2012
4:12-cv-00004-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Linn v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN LINN PLAINTIFF v. CHAD MASON DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 4, 2012

Citations

4:12-cv-00004-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)