From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 25, 2008
No. 05-07-01135-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-07-01135-CR

Opinion issued March 25, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F05-41472-Q.

Before Justices WHITTINGTON, RICHTER, and MAZZANT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Felicia Yvette Lindsey waived a jury and pleaded guilty to theft of property valued at $1500 or more but less than $20,000. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (Vernon 2003). The trial judge assessed punishment, enhanced by one prior felony conviction, at five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Lindsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 25, 2008
No. 05-07-01135-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Lindsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:FELICIA YVETTE LINDSEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

No. 05-07-01135-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2008)