From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 13, 2011
348 S.W.3d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED96042.

September 13, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Angela Turner Quigless, Judge.

D. Warren Hoff, Jr. St. Louis, MO for Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.



ORDER


Torrey Lindsey appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Lindsey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 13, 2011
348 S.W.3d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Lindsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Torrey LINDSEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

348 S.W.3d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)