From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsey v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 18, 2021
21-cv-1757 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-1757 (ECT/DTS)

10-18-2021

Christopher Lindsey, Plaintiff, v. B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ERIC C. TOSTRUD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 2, 2021. ECF No. 6. No. party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; and
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Lindsey v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 18, 2021
21-cv-1757 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Lindsey v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Lindsey, Plaintiff, v. B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

21-cv-1757 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Oct. 18, 2021)