From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsay v. Nelson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 28, 2015
CV 15-03348-ODW(JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2015)

Opinion

          For Shirley Lindsay, Plaintiff: Dennis Jay Price, II, Phyl Grace, Raymond George Ballister, Jr, Mark D Potter, Center for Disability Access, San Diego, CA.

          For Frances Nelson, in individual, Frances Nelson, representative capacity as trustee of the Frances Nelson Living Trust, Defendants: John W Shenk, Ervin Cohen and Jessup LLP, Beverly Hills, CA.


          PROCEEDINGS: MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

          OTIS D WRIGHT II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than August 3, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

         The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:

         o Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence.

         o Answer by the defendant(s)

         In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.


Summaries of

Lindsay v. Nelson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 28, 2015
CV 15-03348-ODW(JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Lindsay v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:Shirley Lindsay v. Frances Nelson et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

CV 15-03348-ODW(JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2015)