From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsay v. City of Baldwin Park

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 4, 2015
CV 15-00800 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)

Opinion


Frank Lindsay v. City of Baldwin Park et al No. CV 15-00800 BRO (MANx) United States District Court, C.D. California June 4, 2015

          PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DISMISSAL

          BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, United States District Judge.

         A Notice of Settlement was filed on May 12, 2015. (Docket No.11.)

         On May 13, 2015, the Court issued an Order directing the parties to file a Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing the action on or before May 25, 2015 or, in the alternative a Joint Status Report.

         The Order specifically warned Plaintiff that the Court could dismiss this action if good cause was not shown for any extension of time and no dismissal was filed.

         To date, however, no dismissal and/or status report has been filed with this Court. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court's Order.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lindsay v. City of Baldwin Park

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 4, 2015
CV 15-00800 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Lindsay v. City of Baldwin Park

Case Details

Full title:Frank Lindsay v. City of Baldwin Park et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

CV 15-00800 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)