From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindell v. Synthes USA

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2015
1:11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2015)

Opinion

          Catha Worthman, Kirsten Scott, Michael Caesar, LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C., Oakland, California, Charles Trudrung Taylor, Ana de Alba, LANG, RICHERT & PATCH, Fresno, California, Counsel for Plaintiff and the Certified Classes.

          BLANK ROME LLP Anthony Haller, Attorneys for Defendants, SYNTHES USA, SYNTHES USA SALES LLC, SYNTHES SPINE COMPANY, LP.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL

          BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

         WHEREAS, on January 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Pursuant to Local Rule 251 (ECF No. 170) seeking an order (1) compelling Defendants to respond in full to Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 1-3, which seek documents from Defendants setting forth the expense, deduction, and compensation policies that have affected Synthes Sales Consultants in California since 2007, and (2) compelling the appearance of Defendants' designated representative(s) for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition;

         WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, the parties stipulated to the Court's Informal Discovery Dispute Resolution process;

         WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, the Court set a telephone conference call with the Court for February 11, 2015, at 9:30 a.m., to address the pending discovery dispute;

         WHEREAS, in meet and confer efforts the parties have resolved their current discovery disputes, while reserving rights, objections, and arguments that may be presented to the parties and to the Court in the future, by (1) the parties agreeing that the 30(b)(6) deposition shall take place on February 25, 2015, and (2) Defendants producing additional policy documents, and confirming that Defendants have now produced all policy documents setting forth the expense, deduction, and compensation policies that have affected Synthes Sales Consultants in California since 2007;

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel on behalf of the respective parties, that Plaintiff shall withdraw his pending Motion to Compel (ECF No. 170), and the matter shall be taken off calendar.

          ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED, pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 170) shall be taken off calendar.


Summaries of

Lindell v. Synthes USA

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2015
1:11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Lindell v. Synthes USA

Case Details

Full title:TROY M. LINDELL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2015

Citations

1:11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2015)