Opinion
6:21-cv-1372-RBD-GJK
11-18-2021
LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. MONICA GABBARD; CHRISTA CONKLIN; CARMEN REYES; and RAYMOND HORNSTEIN, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON JR. United States District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a pro se Amended Complaint against judicial assistants and one public defender alleging, among other things, illegal arrest, illegal retainment of property, and retaliation. (Doc. 7.) She also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 8 (“Motion”).) Given Plaintiff's pattern of filing frivolous documents, the Court previously required all filings by Plaintiff to be reviewed for frivolity. (Doc. 20.) So on referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly entered a Report and Recommendation submitting that the Court deny the Motion and dismiss the Amended Complaint with prejudice as unintelligible, illegible, and noncompliant with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 22, p. 3 (“R&R”).)
The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The R&R (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED.
3. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.