From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Denike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 27, 2011
Case No. CV 11-08459-MMM(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-08459-MMM(JEMx)

12-27-2011

Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al v. Huynh Thi Denike

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None appearing Attorneys Present for Defendants: None appearing


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL


Present: The Honorable MARGARET M. MORROW

ANEL HUERTA Deputy Clerk

N/A Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None appearing

Attorneys Present for Defendants: None appearing Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution; Vacating

Scheduling Conference

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 20 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before January 3, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response.

If plaintiff files

[] Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s):

[x] An answer by the following defendant(s): Huynh Thi Denike

[x] Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Huynh Thi Denike

[] Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause.

The scheduling conference erroneously set for March 12, 2012 is hereby vacated.


Summaries of

Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Denike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 27, 2011
Case No. CV 11-08459-MMM(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Denike

Case Details

Full title:Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al v. Huynh Thi Denike

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 27, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-08459-MMM(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2011)