From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

January, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P.J., and Dore, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the following grounds: There was a failure of proof; the verdict is contrary to the overwhelming evidence and the charge failed to properly place the issues of fact before the jury.


Consolidated actions to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in an automobile of defendant Canaday Cooler Co., Inc., driven by defendant Jack Rubin. The complaint alleges that defendant Rubin so negligently operated the car as to cause it to drive off the road and overturn. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRED LINCER, Respondent, v. CANADAY COOLER CO., INC., Appellant. FRED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)