From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linam v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS
Nov 29, 2012
No. 10-11-00454-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-11-00454-CR

11-29-2012

MARGARET EVA LINAM, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-1231-C2


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court found Margaret Eva Linam guilty of the offense of failure to comply with sex-offender registration requirements and sentenced her to ten years' imprisonment. Linam appealed.

Linam's appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Linam filed a pro se response; however, she does not raise any arguable issues.

In an Anders case, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment.

We grant appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Linam. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Linam a copy of our decision, notify her of her right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter certifying counsel's compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed November 29, 2012
Do not publish
[CR25]


Summaries of

Linam v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS
Nov 29, 2012
No. 10-11-00454-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Linam v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET EVA LINAM, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

No. 10-11-00454-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 29, 2012)