From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lin Hui Chen v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 15, 2024
CV 23-9698-MWF(BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-9698-MWF(BFMx)

03-15-2024

Lin Hui Chen v. Bank of America N.A.


Present: The Honorable: MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

A review of the docket in this action reflects that the Complaint was filed on November 10, 2023. (Docket No. 1). On November 27, 2023, Plaintiff (at the time proceeding pro se) filed an Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 10). On January 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service of the Summons upon Defendant Bank of America N.A. (Docket No. 12). The Proof of Service does not specify which version of the Complaint was served on Defendant.

On February 7, 2024, an Ex Parte Application for (1) a Temporary Restraining Order, and (2) an Order to Show Cause (the “Ex Parte Application”) was filed by attorney Safora Nowrouzi, identified as “Attorney for Plaintiff.” (Docket No. 13). Attorney Nowrouzi did not file a Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney or Notice of Appearance prior to filing the Ex Parte Application. However, attorney Nowrouzi updated the docket to reflect representation of Plaintiff, which replaced the information for pro se Plaintiff. On February 8, 2024, the Court filed a Scheduling Notice and Order regarding the Ex Parte Application. (Docket No. 14). That same day, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Withdrawal of the Ex Parte Application. (Docket No. 15).

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 4(m), the time for Plaintiff to properly serve Defendant with the Summons and Amended Complaint expired on February 8, 2024. However, in light of Plaintiff's prior pro se status, the Court extends that deadline.

The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court will accept the following no later than MARCH 29, 2024.

• BY PLAINTIFF: PROOF OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint on Defendant.
AND/OR
• BY DEFENDANT: RESPONSE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. The parties may also file an appropriate stipulation to extend the time within which Defendant must respond to the Complaint.

No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause by MARCH 29, 2024, will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lin Hui Chen v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 15, 2024
CV 23-9698-MWF(BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Lin Hui Chen v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Lin Hui Chen v. Bank of America N.A.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

CV 23-9698-MWF(BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)