Opinion
CV 23-01012-AB (PVCx)
03-19-2024
Lihui Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
On February 29, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See OSC (Dkt. No. 12). Plaintiff was required to respond to the OSC by March 14, 2024. Id. The Court advised Plaintiff that the failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Id.
On March 14, 2024, Defendants filed a Status Report and Declaration, indicating, among other things, that Plaintiff s 1-589 Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal has been adjudicated, and thus this action is moot.
To date. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the OSC.
The Court therefore DISMISSES this action for lack of prosecution.
IT IS SO ORDERED