From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ligon v. Dunklin

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 15, 2006
237 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4-661.

Opinion delivered June 15, 2006.

1. ATTORNEY CLIENT — REGULATION OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT — BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDERED. — Following receipt of the special judge's findings of fact and conclusion of law and recommendation of sanctions, the supreme court directed the clerk to set briefing schedules for the respective parties.

Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, by: Michael E. Harmon, for appellant.

Richard E. Holiman, for appellee.


[1] Special Judge, Jack L. Lessenberry, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of Sanctions on May 22, 2006. See Section 13 of the Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct. The parties now must file briefs. Section 13D. We request the Supreme Court Clerk to set briefing schedules for the respective parties. Moreover, we bring to the parties' attention our most recent case of Ligon v. Newman, 365 Ark. 510, 231 S.W.3d 662 (2006), for whatever relevance it may have in this appeal. See also Ligon v. Newman, 361 Ark. 354, 206 S.W.3d 826 (2005) ( per curiam).


Summaries of

Ligon v. Dunklin

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 15, 2006
237 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2006)
Case details for

Ligon v. Dunklin

Case Details

Full title:Stark LIGON, as Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

237 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2006)
237 S.W.3d 78