From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lifete v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 24, 2012
100 So. 3d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D12–1481.

2012-10-24

Elifen LIFETE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge.
James J. Zonas, Naples, for Appellant.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Elifen Lifete appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the postconviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios–Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios–Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lifete v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 24, 2012
100 So. 3d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Lifete v. State

Case Details

Full title:Elifen LIFETE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 24, 2012

Citations

100 So. 3d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)