Summary
considering a claim of discrimination under the ADA and holding that the denial of certain accommodations did not qualify as adverse employment actions
Summary of this case from Sinkfield v. Univ. of Tex. Med. BranchOpinion
A-13-CA-145 DAE
05-23-2014
SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
TO: THE HONORABLE DAVID A. EZRA
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court submits this Supplement to its Report and Recommendation in this case dated May 23, 2014 (Dkt. No. 32), to correct a typographical error on page 10. The last sentence of Section IV.A of the Report and Recommendation is withdrawn, and is replaced with the following sentence:
Thus, the disparate treatment Title I ADA discrimination claim fails as a matter of law.The Report and Recommendation remains the same in all other respects.
__________
ANDREW W. AUSTIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE